They tell us it's for safety, but every leaked program shows it's used to monitor activists, dissidents, and anyone questioning power. When people start connecting dots on inequality, endless wars, or ecological collapse, surveillance lets authorities nip "dangerous" ideas in the bud. A truly free society wouldn't need to hoover up everyone's texts, searches, and movements. The panopticon isn't protection — it's preemptive thought control to maintain the status quo. End mass surveillance or admit we're not free.
Join some communities to see them here.
Follow users to see them here.
Subscribed
You are not subscribed to any channels
Subscribed
You are not subscribed to any collections
Debate
About Community
This is a space for respectful, structured, and thought-provoking debate on topics big and small. Politics, philosophy, science, ethics, current events—no idea is off-limits as long as it’s discussed with logic, clarity, and civility.
State your position, challenge others, and sharpen your thinking through civil discourse. Personal attacks, low-effort comments, and bad faith arguments are not welcome.
Disagree passionately. Debate respectfully. Think critically.
Community Rules
- Posts must pose a debate stance for others to rebuttal
- Be civil, no attacking other people
- Upvote/Downvote comments based on how good an argument is made